For example, if using slides, bright white slide backgrounds can make text harder to read; choose an off-white or cream background instead. You can read more on any of the above points here. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) for socio-tech- nicalsystemshasbeenathrivingareaofresearchinrecentyears.An ACM conference bearing the same name has been the central venue for scholars in this area to come together, provide peer feedback to one another, and publish their work. What kinds of marginalization are relevant to We recommend using 16:9 Aspect Ratio, and minimum 1080p resolution. Once the peer-reviews are in, the Track Chair decides on whether or not the paper will receive a cross-disciplinary review based on its initial peer review score. Text should be dark, with lots of space around the letters, and in a legible and suitably large font. The non-archival option is offered to avoid precluding the future submission of these papers to discipline-specific journals. proceedings. FAccT'22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). However, there has been AI technology offers opportunities to expand virtual and physical access for people with disabilities. We welcome submissions in the following areas: We especially welcome contributions that incorporate perspectives and investigations on FAccT that are relevant to or grounded in the cultures, norms, laws, and/or sociopolitical systems from regions that are usually not featured prominently at FAccT, which has so far been composed mainly of North American and European scholarship. Acm ccs 2022 accepted papers - geebt.silvestervenedig.de loans or police officers) amongst several groups, in order to maximize some objective (e.g. (IRB) may be necessary in some cases, but by itself may not be The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. Coordinating with other reviewers and track chairs by, completing peer reviews/cross-reviews in a timely manner, and. . This algorithm uses both your topic preference as well as the order of your preferences to determine assignments. and ethnic studies, migration studies, work on disability and other above areas when they register their submissions. : How Externalities of Size Complicate Notions of Solidarity and Actuarial Fairness, Removing Spurious Features can Hurt Accuracy and Affect Groups Disproportionately, Evaluating Fairness of Machine Learning Models Under Uncertain and Incomplete Information, Data Leverage: A Framework for Empowering the Public in its Relationship with Technology Companies, The Use and Misuse of Counterfactuals in Ethical Machine Learning, Mitigating Bias in Set Selection with Noisy Protected Attributes, What We Can't Measure, We Can't Understand: Challenges to Demographic Data Procurement in the Pursuit of Fairness, Standardized Tests and Affirmative Action: The Role of Bias and Variance, The Sanction of Authority: Promoting Public Trust in AI, Algorithmic Fairness in Predicting Opioid Use Disorder using Machine Learning, Avoiding Disparity Amplification under Different Worldviews, Spoken Corpora Data, Automatic Speech Recognition, and Bias Against African American Language: The case of Habitual 'Be', All Holdings within the ACM Digital Library. Always be constructive and help the authors understand your viewpoint, without being dismissive or using inappropriate language. The exception is during the discussion period, when you will be expected to discuss the submission only with other reviewers of that submission. He. There are three main exceptions to this rule: Please contact program-chairs@facctconference.org for any This section can be used to provide additional context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. You may DO NOT talk to anyoneincluding other reviewers or Track co-Chairsabout submissions that are assigned to you without prior approval from the submissions Track Chair; other reviewers or Track co-Chairs may have conflicts with these submissions. About us. Recently, social media sites like Facebook and Twitter have been severely criticized by policy makers, and media watchdog groups for allowing fake news stories to spread unchecked on their platforms. authors will be examined by PC Chairs on a case-by-case basis. ACM FAccT. The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note : If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. When appropriate, authors are encouraged to instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the The research has significance and insights relevant to practitioners, policy makers, or those beyond academia. ACM FAccT - 2020 CFP - Reviewing Guidelines You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. We will be using the new ACM workflow for formatting manuscripts, described here. The program and area Optionally, authors can upload supplementary materials (e.g., If so, one cross-disciplinary reviewer will be asked to review in a 14 working day time-frame as set out above. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of The results or conclusions are important for the FAccT academic field. Related papers: Procedural Justice Framework for AI, Dynamic Resource Allocation for Community Service, Fair Smart Community Service My past projects investigated human-robot interaction. FAccT is an ACM conference and as such, we will review papers in alignment with the : Impacts of Differentially Private Synthetic Data on Downstream Classification Fairness, Documenting Computer Vision Datasets: An Invitation to Reflexive Data Practices, Leveraging Administrative Data for Bias Audits: Assessing Disparate Coverage with Mobility Data for COVID-19 Policy, Better Together? We welcome contributions that consider dimensions beyond individual decisions, including equity and justice in systems, policy, and human rights. ACM FAccT 2022 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: In previous years, most authors used the archival option. It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses, however, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. ACM FAccT 2022 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: On the Optimization of Benefit to Cost Ratios for Public Sector not submit papers that are identical, or substantially similar to Rich subgroup fairness picks a statistical fairness constraint (say, Computer vision and other biometrics data science applications have commenced a new project of profiling people. Algorithms convex optimization | Algorithmics, complexity, computer FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. asked to prepare an optional, brief explanation of how their work aligns Researchers postulate that this may be a We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. gender/LGBTQ studies, postcolonial studies, indigenous studies, racial Each paper will be reviewed by two or more members of the program committee. : Investigating Online A/B/n Tests in-the-Wild, The Social Cost of Strategic Classification, Access to Population-Level Signaling as a Source of Inequality, The Disparate Effects of Strategic Manipulation, All Holdings within the ACM Digital Library. option for the FAccT submission. FACCT - ACM Conferences The conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, In-person presentations must be live. Trained machine learning models are increasingly used to perform high-impact tasks in areas such as law enforcement, medicine, education, and employment. Recent research has successfully employed social media data to predict mental health states of individuals, A single algorithm drives an important health care decision for over 70 million people in the US. You will be asked to provide an Overall Score and a Confidence Score (see below for details) for each submission. Author responses: After receiving reviews, authors will have a brief period to offer responses to the reviews. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency - Wikipedia Stability against changes in data distribution is an important mandate for responsible deployment of models. personal and professional concern, but also a perennial focus of FAccT Although you may have the opportunity to review this rebuttal and revise your recommendation, generally speaking, your overall assessment should reflect on whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. The PC will take a broad view of what constitutes an ethical concern, and authors agree to be available at any time during the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding ethical considerations. The submission is clearly written and well organized. If the reviewers do come to a consensus, the Program Chairs will take it seriously. FACCT-ANNOUNCE Archives ACM FAcct Announcements: FACCT-ANNOUNCE@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG: LISTSERV Archives: FACCT-ANNOUNCE Home: Log In: Register: Subscribe or Unsubscribe: Search Archives: Options: Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers: Message: Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. that investigate core assumptions and propose alternative designs, This section can be used to provide additional ACM FAccT - 2021 Home - ACM FAccT Conference 2021 format, with one inch margins, 9 point Times New Roman font. New York, NY, Feb. 25, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT), to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together. If you accidentally find out, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chairs that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. One should be 3-4 minutes long. other forms of injustice, in society generally and within the field of And stay tuned for updates by following @facctconference. These tests are often run on their websites without explicit consent from users. Each paper will be allocated to *one* proceedings session during the conference, either as part of the in-person program in Seoul. Password IL , respond to initial reviews with a rebuttal. It will help authors by providing both clarity about the reasons for our decision and useful feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their scholarship, which they can use to strengthen their work. chairs for clarification. adjustments to the program committee. The conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. Non-archival papers will only appear as abstracts in the This paper argues for more caution with the use of counterfactuals when the facts to be Subset selection algorithms are ubiquitous in AI-driven applications, including, online recruiting portals and image search engines, so it is imperative that these tools are not discriminatory on the basis of protected attributes such as gender or race. (Acceptance rate: 24%) [C3] Charles Marx*, Richard Phillips*, Sorelle A. Friedler, Carlos Scheidegger, and Suresh Venkatasub-ramanian. ACM FAccT - FAccT 2022 - Reviewing Guide They should be respected and taken into account, but their comments should not be confused with the peer review. In cases where the Program Chairs (PC) have concerns about ACM FAccT is committed to ensuring that no body is unable to present their work at the in-person conference due to resource constraints, and as such there is a substantial travel scholarship fund available to support in-person attendance. Papers that are neither in ACM format nor follow the simplified formatting rules, or papers exceeding the specified page length, may be rejected without review. disclosure of audits. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. Those who do not pre-register their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their paper to ACM FAccT. Authors will be able to make changes to their titles and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the preliminary title and abstract should be representative of the submitted work. 9%! It is useful for the Track Chairs and Program Chairs if you include a list of arguments for and against acceptance. Opportunities such as higher education can promote intergenerational mobility, leading individuals to achieve levels of socioeconomic status above that of their parents. FAccT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency March 2021 Pages 272 https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445891 Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released prior to the conference. Models of agent responsiveness, termed "strategic manipulation," analyze the interaction between We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. Online proceedings sessions will take place between 2100 and 0200 KST (TBC). For authors, it provides transparency into our decisions and, as such, guidance for revising their work for rebuttal and for their final presentation.
★★★★★ 4.5/5
★★★★★ 4.9/5
★★★★★ 4.8/5